Chris Buckley, son of the late champion of upper middle class right wing intelligentsia and the American way, William F. Buckley, was unceremoniously cut loose from the National Review. The publication was founded by Bill back in the day when the commies were coming.
Technically, Chris was not fired. After he published his conservative case for Obama in The Daily Beast, he offered his resignation to the National Review as a gentlemanly gesture. It was promptly accepted, not to anyone's surprise. But one would think the conservatives might think about this before continuing to present the conservative movement as a "big yurt" rather than the "big tent" they like to talk about. This is paraphrasing one of Chris Buckley's recent comments online.
On the Huffington Post today, in an artice by Jason Linkins, Chris Buckley offers up this explanation of the situation:
Within hours of my endorsement appearing in The Daily Beast it became clear that National Review had a serious problem on its hands. So the next morning, I thought the only decent thing to do would be to offer to resign my column there. This offer was accepted--rather briskly!--by Rich Lowry, NR's editor, and its publisher, the superb and able and fine Jack Fowler. I retain the fondest feelings for the magazine that my father founded, but I will admit to a certain sadness that an act of publishing a reasoned argument for the opposition should result in acrimony and disavowal...
So, I have been effectively fatwahed (is that how you spell it?) by the conservative movement, and the magazine that my father founded must now distance itself from me. But then, conservatives have always had a bit of trouble with the concept of diversity..
In one article Chris quotes Ronald Reagan: I haven't left the republican party. It left me.
NursePam's Word of the Day: Fatwah
noun (Islam) a legal opinion or ruling issued by an Islamic scholar; "bin Laden issued three fatwahs calling upon Muslims to take up arms against the United States"
Is this anything like Fatuous?
Main Entry:
fatuous
1 Part of Speech: adj Definition: inanely foolish and unintelligent; stupid
Etymology: Latin fatuus 'foolish'
Bill Buckley was quite the Renaissance man. I liked him, may he rest in peace. I like outrageous people no matter what their politics. And if they are charming and can use words of three syllables or greater, I will listen to what they have to say even though I may not agree.
You can tell by the above picture of Chris that he grew up happy and confident. Meaning Bill was probably a decent dad. Which is why I think it possible that Bill is turning over in his grave right about now.
I can only hope that Chris decides to follow in his father's footsteps, perhaps to found a publication that represents a more reasoned and diverse picture of the American conservative movement.
On a different but related note, Stanley Kurtz has this to say in an article in the National Review Online entitled Wright 101:
It looks like Jeremiah Wright was just the tip of the iceberg. Not only did Barack Obama savor Wright’s sermons, Obama gave legitimacy — and a whole lot of money — to education programs built around the same extremist anti-American ideology preached by Reverend Wright. And guess what? Bill Ayers is still palling around with the same bitterly anti-American Afrocentric ideologues that he and Obama were promoting a decade ago. All this is revealed by a bit of digging, combined with a careful study of documents from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the education foundation Obama and Ayers jointly led in the late 1990s.
Give me a break!
I fail to understand why a thinking, young black man of Obama's era and born of an African father and a white mother, would not venture into exploring Afro-centric politics and culture. And why is this anti-American?
It pleases me that Barak Obama seems to be more a Child of the Universe than does the typical middle American, ethnocentric over 60 white guy. I want someone who has looked at all of the possibilities to lead this country. I want a person who is not the standard issue candidate. We have been there and done that. And now we have damn near bought the farm.
The fact that our culture has not psychologically grasped the truth that by 2050 caucasians will make up only 46% of our population, does not make it any less true. To ignore this reality is grossly counterproductive to any sort of progress we hope to achieve as a nation.
If the conservative faction does not wake up to this fact, they will be in danger of following in the steps of the dinosaurs and taking the rest of us with them.